The County Policing Authority (CPA) is established under Section 41 of the National Police Service Act. It is a security oversight body that incorporates county government officials, security agencies, and members of the public in security management at the county level.
π Each of the 47 counties must establish a County Policing Authority (CPA), but implementation has faced challenges due to opposition from the national government and the National Police Service, which view security as a national function rather than a devolved one.
πΉ Membership of the County Policing Authority
The County Policing Authority consists of:
β
The County Governor β Chairperson
β
A representative of the National Intelligence Service
β
County police representatives appointed by the Inspector-General, including:
- Head of the National Police Service at the county level
- Head of the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) at the county level
β Two elected members nominated by the County Assembly
β Chairperson of the County Security Committee
β At least six non-state members appointed by the Governor, from: - Business sector
- Community-based organizations
- Womenβs groups
- People with disabilities
- Religious organizations
- Youth organizations
π The Deputy Governor may chair meetings in the Governorβs absence.
π Non-state members are recruited by the County Public Service Board through a competitive process and vetted by the County Security Committee and County Assembly.
πΉ Qualifications for Non-State Members
π« A person CANNOT be appointed if they:
β Violate the Constitution
β Are bankrupt
β Have been convicted of a felony
β Have a poor moral standing
β Have not been a resident or employee in the county for at least three years
π Non-state members serve for two years and may be reappointed for one additional term.
πΉ Functions of the County Policing Authority
The CPA plays a crucial role in security oversight, public engagement, and crime monitoring at the county level.
1οΈβ£ Developing Security Priorities
β Formulates policing priorities for the county.
β Identifies key security threats and areas of concern.
2οΈβ£ Monitoring Crime Trends
β Tracks crime trends and patterns, especially those affecting women and children.
β Identifies high-crime areas and recommends strategic interventions.
3οΈβ£ Overseeing Police Performance
β Reviews police performance in the county.
β Provides feedback to the National Police Service on its effectiveness.
4οΈβ£ Community Engagement in Security
β Provides a platform for public participation in security matters.
β Receives reports from Community Policing Forums and committees.
β Enhances Nyumba Kumi and community policing initiatives.
5οΈβ£ Ensuring Police Accountability
β Ensures that the police are accountable to the public.
β Monitors budget utilization and financial management in county policing.
6οΈβ£ Preparing Reports for Stakeholders
β Produces quarterly reports for:
- Inspector-General of Police
- Cabinet Secretary for Security
- County Assembly
- County Governor
β Reports cover police performance, security challenges, and policy recommendations.
πΉ Limitations of the County Policing Authority
π The CPA CANNOT interfere with police operations, including:
π« Criminal investigations
π« Enforcement of the law against specific individuals
π« Hiring, promoting, suspending, or dismissing police officers
π« Operational activities of the National Police Service
πΉ Meetings of the County Policing Authority
β The CPA must meet at least once every three months.
β Meetings are held at a time and venue determined by the Chairperson (Governor).
β The quorum is 50% of total members.
β The Cabinet Secretary for Security provides policy guidelines for the CPAβs operations.
πΉ Funding of the County Policing Authority
π° The CPAβs expenses are funded by the National Police Service.
π° Members receive allowances determined by the Cabinet Secretary for Security, with advice from the Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC).
π Conclusion
The County Policing Authority (CPA) is a critical security oversight body that bridges the gap between county governments, police agencies, and the public.
β
Enhances community participation in policing.
β
Improves police accountability and transparency.
β
Monitors crime trends and recommends solutions.
β
Ensures police services meet county security needs.
π Despite legal backing, challenges such as national government opposition, slow implementation, and resource constraints have hindered full operationalization in all counties. π